Eric_Stanek Veteran

@Eric_Stanek · Joined 7 years ago · 762 posts · 29 topics · 368 reputation

Badges

First message Somebody likes you Keeps coming back I like it a lot Can't stop! Seriously likeable! Can't get enough of your stuff ✏️ First Post 💬 Conversation Starter ❤️ Well Liked

Recent posts

  • Core DevOps Fuzz (Apr-Jun 2023) · 3 years ago

    @Gerrald Sorry, but there is a HUGE point you have missed, over and over and over. It would be impossible to do the math, but if we could, I am willing to bet that over 95% of the effort put into PIVX

  • NOW + LBank top up · 3 years ago

    Excellent. Sorry for the misunderstanding.I misread. Just that we are at the last minutes of the voting cycle and I was worried things were being done improperly and creating risks for you and the DAO

  • NOW + LBank top up · 3 years ago

    There were funds voted on for multiple exchange listings. LBank NOW Whitebit DEXtrade etc. Funds for each must be kept separate. If the price drop means they are not sufficient, then you can ask for m

  • Core DevOps Fuzz (Apr-Jun 2023) · 3 years ago

    @Gerrald Sorry. Although it has been explained to you countless times, you still don't get it. @fuzzbawls was never voted in. He joined PIVX a long time ago and proved himself. Same for every dev who

  • CoreDev-Liquid-May-July · 3 years ago

    @Cryptosi: Sorry for misquoting you. perhaps it was 7hacks that argued for one general dev proposal. It was a long time ago and really personal attribution wasnt my point, wasnt trying to point finger

  • CoreDev-Liquid-May-July · 3 years ago

    @Gerrald: I've noted Allesandro mention the dev channel? How does this work? Is it the same as some people don't have access to discord channels which if open discussions were happening everyone could

  • CoreDev-Liquid-May-July · 3 years ago

    @Cryptosi: These are not Public Jabs, this is transparency in action. I agree with all of the rest of your observations, PR count isnt fair, but I'm very happy that the developers are holding each oth

  • CoreDev-Liquid-May-July · 3 years ago

    @Alessandro Rezzi: Not proposed in your proposal but that 2 PRs has been literally all the core developer work you have done this last cycle I honestly don't see any communication issue, I would have

  • CoreDev-Liquid-May-July · 3 years ago

    @Alessandro_Rezzi The update on your proposal which just completed includes 4 PRs. (A 5th was reported last cycle, but had the bulk of effort done the cycle prior. So, I didn't include it.) So, that's

  • CoreDev-Liquid-May-July · 3 years ago

    I think everyone can agree, that 'measuring' effort based on a count of PRs is not fair at all. One PR may take 20 mins. Another may take 20 days. Knowing this, it is quite disingenuous to imply 23 PR